How the Greek (2nd Century B.C.) and Roman Armies (1st Century A.D.) with Their Idols of Zeus Literally fulfill All Bible Prophecies Concerning the Abomination that Causes Desolation
The Literal Fulfillment of the Abomination that Causes Desolation: The Abomination that Causes Desolation is the Greek and Roman Armies with their Idols to Foreign Gods that Caused the Desolation of Israel.
Mark 13:14 and Luke 21:20-21 record Jesus’ words during the Olivet discourse very similarly. The biggest difference between these two gospels is that instead of saying, “When you see ‘the abomination that causes desolation’ standing where it does not belong . . . .” as Mark does in Mark 13:14, Luke says, “When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies . . . .” The implication of this difference is that rather than using the epithet the abomination that causes desolation as Mark does in Mark 13:14, Luke appears to be defining the abomination that causes desolation. Ancient armies carried idols (images of their gods) wherever they went. The Greeks of the second century B.C. and Romans of the first century A.D. did as well. These idols of foreign gods are an abomination to the Jews. It is for this reason that foreign armies like the Greeks of the second century B.C. and Romans of the first century A.D. are called the abomination that causes desolation. These two foreign armies were an abomination to the Jews because of the idol images they carried. Furthermore, both armies literally CAUSED the desolation of Jerusalem. This is why these armies are called the “abomination that causes desolation.”
Graven images and foreign gods are an abomination according to the Law of Moses. The spiritual presence of the deity in the idol was expected to ensure martial victory to its devotees. Through faith in their idols of Zeus, two pagan armies caused the desolation of Israel. The Greeks were the first to do so in the second century B.C. during the Maccabean Wars. Then in the first century A.D., the Romans caused even greater havoc during the Jewish War. The abomination that causes desolation is the Greek and Roman armies with their pagan idols of Zeus and Jupiter on their ensigns that literally caused the desolation of the Holy Land. After making Jerusalem desolate, the Greeks converted the temple in Jerusalem into a temple to Zeus as a gesture of thanks and honor to their god. The Romans did the same. After the second Jewish revolt, the Romans built a temple to Jupiter, the Roman name for Zeus, on the site in which the former Temple once stood.
Though it is certainly true that the abomination that causes desolation refers to foreign armies and their idols that caused the desolation of Israel, there is a kind of poetry to this phrase in that it also refers to an abominable act that both the Greek and Roman armies performed in the Jewish Temple. In other words, there is a kind of poetic depth to this term in the way this prophecy was fulfilled historically in the second century B.C. and especially in the first century A.D. (One of the legions in Titus’ army, Legio X Fretensis, was represented by a boar perfectly signifying the abomination that causes desolation when the Greeks of the second century B.C. and Romans of the first century A.D. sacrificed a pig/boar in the Jewish Temple in the worship of foreign gods.)
The abomination that causes desolation is a term used in the Bible to refer to both the Maccabean Wars in Daniel 11:31 and the Jewish War at the end of the age in the remaining verses. During the Maccabean Wars of the second century B.C., the Greeks attacked Jerusalem causing a great slaughter in the city. The Greeks then set up an idol of Zeus (2 Macc 6:1-2) and sacrificed a pig in the Temple in Jerusalem (1 Macc 1:59; Wars 1.1.2).1 This act is referred to as “a desolating sacrilege” in 1 Macc 1:54 and “the abomination that causes desolation” in Daniel 11:31.
The Romans did almost exactly the same thing in A.D. 70! Upon seizing the Temple, the Romans set up their ensigns on the eastern gate and offered sacrifices to them (Wars 6.6.1).2 The main ensign was Aquila, the eagle that carries ZEUS’ lightning bolt. Here we see a veritable idol of Zeus like that erected 200 years earlier by the Greek army in the Jewish Temple during the Maccabean Wars. What animals did the Romans sacrifice? Historians believe the Roman army likely sacrificed the suovetaurilia in the Temple that day in A.D. 70. The suovetaurialia is a ritual sacrifice of three animals: a sheep, an ox and a pig for the purpose of land purification. The suovetaurilia was customarily performed for the purification of a Temple that had been destroyed. Did you catch that? The Romans set up a veritable idol of Zeus in the Temple and offered a pig in sacrifice to it exactly like the Greeks did 200 years earlier which Daniel 11:31 referred to as “the abomination that causes desolation.” (1 Macc 1:54, 59; 2 Macc 6:1-2; Wars 1.1.2.) Thus if it is true that the abomination that causes desolation was originally fulfilled in the setting up of an idol of Zeus together with the sacrificing of a pig in the Temple, and if the Romans did the same thing, it should be no surprise that the same term is used to describe both events. (See Why Historians Believe Titus Sacrificed a Pig to the Ensigns in the Temple in A.D. 70.)
The Literal Fulfillment of the Abomination that Causes Desolation: During the Jewish War, Rome laid waste to Israel and worshiped the Ensign called the Aquila, an Idol of Zeus and Rome, on the Eastern Gate of the Temple.
During the Jewish war with Rome in the middle of the first century A.D. the idol of Zeus was the Aquila, the chief ensign of the Roman army. Aquila is an eagle who carried Zeus’ lightning bolt and served as Zeus’ messenger.3 The ensigns were more than military flags or standards signifying Rome and its many legions, the ensigns were idols in the most literal sense of the word as they were regularly worshipped by the soldiers of the Roman army. In fact, the Roman army worshipped and offered sacrifices to the ensigns on the eastern gate of the Temple in A.D. 70.4 Thus the ensign called the Aquila is in a sense an idol of Zeus himself while doubling as the national symbol of Rome just as the bald eagle is the national symbol of the United States.
Because the ensigns were graven images, idols and foreign gods, it is not surprising that they were considered an abomination in first century Judea. The abominable nature of the Roman ensigns is exemplified in The Antiquities of the Jews. In this important historical work, Josephus tells us that in A.D. 37 the Jews begged the governor of Syria not to pass through Judea with the Roman legions because it was a violation of the Law of Moses for Jews to be in the presence of the Roman ensigns.5 Similarly, when Pilate snuck the ensigns into Jerusalem at night he was greeted with an angry crowd of Jews who petitioned him to remove the ensigns from Jerusalem. Pilate acquiesced when he saw that the Jews were willing to die rather than accept the presence of these idols in Jerusalem.6
The main ensign, the Aquila, was typically depicted carrying Zeus’ the lightning bolt in its talons. Amidst the siege of A.D. 70 the Roman army likely fired firebrands into Jerusalem. These firebrands, the Aquila clutching Zeus’ lightning bolt, and the Legio XXII Fulminata, “the Thunderbolt 12th Legion,” whose emblem, not surprisingly, is a lightning bolt are collectively the “fire from heaven” mentioned in Revelation 13:13-15. The fact that Titus called down fire from heaven in fulfillment of Revelation 13:13-15 not only links him to Elijah, and thus the false prophet of Revelation 19:20, it also metaphorically portrays him as something like the human embodiment or earthly counterpart of Zeus, the thunder god. Let us now take a look at how these pagan armies with their idols of Zeus fulfill all Bible verses about the abomination that causes desolation.
There is real-life Biblical-historical poetry to the term “abomination that causes desolation.” Above I said that the abomination that causes desolation refers to both the Greek and Roman armies and their idolatrous ensigns. The Roman army is called an abomination because of the unlawful ensign idols that always accompanied this army (Antiquities 18.3.1; 18.5.3). The Roman army also literally caused the desolation of Israel. This is why the Roman army is called “the abomination that causes desolation” as this abominable army literally caused the desolation of Palestine. Above I also said that the abomination that causes desolation refers to a specific abominable act performed by this army namely the worshiping the ensigns (graven images of Caesar and Rome) and the sacrificing of a pig to these ensigns in the Temple. The fact that the abomination that causes desolation is both an army and an action is perfectly illustrated by the images on the Roman ensigns themselves. No image better illustrates this fact than the ensign of Legio X Fretensis whose image is a pig or boar! Here we see history out-writing literature as this ensign perfectly ties this army together with their blasphemous acts powerfully picturing the abomination that causes desolation as both an army and its deeds. What better way to portray an army who sacrificed a pig in the Temple then to have an image of a boar on its military flag?
The Literal Fulfillment of the Abomination that Causes Desolation: The Incredibly Symbolically Rich Link between the Roman Army’s Worship of the Ensigns in the Temple and the Jewish Abomination or Sin that Caused the Desolation of Palestine at the End of the Age.
As stated above, there is a kind of poetry to the term abomination that causes desolation. Not only is this an apt term for the army that caused the desolation of Jerusalem, it is also the perfect term for the actions of the Roman army who under Titus almost exactly replicated the actions of the original “abomination that causes desolation” of Daniel 11:31 under Antiochus Epiphanies 200 years earlier. Yet there is even greater depth to this term.
The abomination that causes desolation also harkens back to the Jewish abomination or sin that literally caused the desolation of Israel at the end of the age. How could the actions of the Roman army signify the Jews’ ultimate sin that caused their destruction? When the Romans worshiped the ensigns in the Temple in A.D. 70 they unwittingly symbolized the ultimate Jewish sin that caused the desolation of Jerusalem. The ensign called the numina legionum (meaning “gods of the legions”) was a large circular medallion with the image of the emperor in the center. In other words, this ensign looked just like a large Roman coin held aloft on a pole. As I explain in detail in Revelation 13: A Preterist Commentary, it was the rich Jews of Jerusalem who killed Jesus and the saints so as to avoid a financially disastrous war of independence from Rome. Remember Israel was a Roman province and so any charismatic figure who strove to become Messiah, king of the Jews, would necessarily drag Israel into a war with Rome which win or lose would likely destroy the Temple, the source of Jerusalem’s whole economy, and the homes and businesses of the wealthy Jewish elites. If Jesus ever became king of the Jews, as the Messiah was expected to be, the rich of Jerusalem would lose everything. This is why the Bible says, “The love of money is the root of all evil,” (1 Tim 6:10) and, “It is harder for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven.” (Mt 19:24.) Israel’s ultimate sin was this love of money that caused the wealthy men of Jerusalem to kill the prophets and saints (Jn 11:47-50; 19:12; Mt 2:1-3, Lk 19:27; Jm 2:1-7; 5:1-6; Lk 11:39, 16:13-15). And it was because of these murders that God punished Israel with the plagues of Revelation (Revelation 6:9-11; 17:4-6; and Matthew 23:29-38). So when the Roman army worshiped these money-shaped ensigns in the Temple it theatrically symbolized Israel’s ultimate sin (1 Tim 6:10) which is the fact that money (the mark of the beast) was their true god. Thus when the Romans worshiped the ensigns in the Temple this act is aptly called the abomination that causes desolation because this abominable deed perfectly symbolizes the Jews’ ultimate abomination that caused their own desolation at the end of the age.
Above we discussed how Daniel 11:31 was fulfilled. Now let us take a look at every other verse concerning the abomination that causes desolation and explain how each was literally fulfilled in the first century.
The Abomination that Causes Desolation in Mark 13:14, Matthew 24:15-16, and Luke 21:20-21: The Arrival of the Roman Army with the Idolatrous Ensigns is the Abomination that Causes Desolation Mentioned in the Olivet Discourse. This Event was a Sign to Flee the City.
When you see ‘the abomination that causes desolation’ standing where it does not belong—let the reader understand—then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. (Mark 13:14)
So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’ spoken of through the prophet Daniel—let the reader understand—then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. (Matthew 24:15-16)
When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near. Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those in the city get out, and let those in the country not enter the city. (Luke 21:20-21)
Mark 13:14, Matt 24:15-16, and Luke 21:20-21 all paraphrase Jesus’ words during the Olivet discourse. Notice that rather than saying, “When you see ‘the abomination that causes desolation’ standing where it does not belong . . . .” as Mark does in Mark 13:14, Luke says, “When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies (Luke 21:20). . . .” The implication of this change is that Luke seems to be defining the abomination that causes desolation as the Roman armies themselves.
Jerusalem is often called the “holy city” (Daniel 9:24, Matthew 4:5 and Revelation 11:2). In Luke 21:20, Jesus warned, “When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near.” The Roman army surrounded Jerusalem three times during Israel’s first century war with Rome.
In Iyyar of A.D. 66, Gessius Florus entered Jerusalem with the Roman army and killed almost four thousand people in the city.7 Later that year Cestius surrounded Jerusalem with the 12th Legion.8 The third time the Roman army encompassed Jerusalem was in A.D. 70 under the command of Caesar Titus.
The presence of the Roman army outside of Jerusalem in Iyyar and later in Tishri of A.D. 66 was Jesus’ sign to His people to quickly flee the city in fulfillment of Luke 21:20-21. The massacre that ensued in Iyyar of A.D. 66 in the Upper Marketplace immediately after the Roman army entered the city explains why Jesus told his people to drop everything and leave after seeing Jerusalem surrounded by armies in Luke 21:20-21. Similarly Cestius’ arrival to and abrupt departure from Jerusalem in Tishri of A.D. 66 preceded a violent civil war in the city. In both occasions those who failed to quickly leave Jerusalem after seeing these armies put their lives in great risk in fulfillment of Mark 13:14, Matthew 24:15-16, and Luke 21:20-21.
Matthew 24:15 and the Abomination of Desolation: When Matthew 24:15 is read Word-For-Word Literally, that Portion of the Verse in Which Jesus alludes to the Abomination of Desolation Standing in the Holy Place appears to Be a Parenthetical Statement meant to link the Abomination of Desolation of Matthew 24:15 with that of Daniel 9:26-27. When this Portion of the Text is Read as a Parenthetical Statement, Jesus appears to be telling His People to Flee as soon as They SEE the Abomination of Desolation, Not when it had already entered the Temple.
According to Matthew 24:15 the abomination that causes desolation was to stand “in the holy place” which is the Temple.9 However, when Titus entered the Temple and the Romans worshipped the ensigns at the eastern gate,10 it was too late to flee the city as the siege was nearly over and the Romans erected a wall around the city to prevent escape.11 However, the word-for-word Interlinear from Greek to English of Matthew 24:15 literally reads, “When therefore you shall see the abomination of desolation WHICH HAVING BEEN SPOKEN OF BY DANIEL THE PROPHET STANDING IN THE HOLY PLACE (Dan 9:26-27) THE ONE READING LET HIM UNDERSTAND then those in Judea let them flee to the mountains.” Did you see that? When Matthew 24:15 is read literally “which having been spoken of by Daniel the prophet standing in the holy place the one reading let him understand” seems to be a parenthetical statement! If nothing else, the phrase “the one reading let him understand” must be parenthetical. How do we know this? Because Jesus never wrote anything, the discourse written in Matthew 24 is something Jesus said to His disciples, it is not something he wrote. This shows that this statement was parenthetically added to Jesus’ words. In other words, Jesus might mention listeners but he would not allude to readers. And if this portion of Matthew 24:15 is parenthetical what does this imply about the phrase immediately before it, is this parenthetical as well? It looks like it. The phrase “which having been spoken of by Daniel the prophet standing in the holy place the one reading let him understand” appears to be an explanatory insert interrupting the sentence so as to link the abomination of desolation of Matthew 24:15 with the abomination of desolation mentioned previously in Daniel 9:26-27.
There are many parenthetical statements in the Bible and because parenthesis did not exist in ancient times modern translators must use context clues to determine when to insert parenthesis. Matthew 24:15 must include a parenthetical statement because without it, Matthew 24:15 appears to contradict Luke 21:20-21, its synoptic equivalent. Luke 21:20-21 reads, “When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near. Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those in the city get out, and let those in the country not enter the city. [Emphasis mine.] (Luke 21:20-21) As stated above, Luke 21:20 appears to be defining the abomination that causes desolation as the Roman armies themselves. How could Jesus instruct his people to drop everything and flee when they see an army surrounding a city presumably so as to lay siege to it in one verse and then issue the same warning when this army is already inside the Temple? An invading army is not likely to enter a city quickly, usually a protracted siege like the one in A.D. 70 is required before an invading force is able to enter a fortified building inside the city like the Temple of Jerusalem. These two verses are irreconcilable when read in this manner since it makes no sense of the speed and urgency in which Jesus tells his disciples to flee.
Thus for clarity Matthew 24:15 should read, “When therefore you shall see the abomination of desolation (which having been spoken of by Daniel standing in the holy place the one reading let him understand) then those in Judea let them flee to the mountains.” By inserting a parenthesis here, this parenthetical statement becomes more obvious to readers making it appear clearer that Jesus meant to tell his people to leave the city as soon as they “see the abomination of desolation,” not necessarily when it stands in the Temple. When read in this way Matthew 24:15 perfectly matches its synoptic equivalent in Lk 21:20-21: “When you SEE JERUSALEM SURROUNDED BY ARMIES, you will know that its desolation is near. Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those in the city get out, and let those in the country not enter the city.” Thus in both Matthew 24:15 and Luke 21:20-21 Jesus tells His people to flee to the mountains when they first see the Romans. (See Could the Abomination that Causes Desolation be Murder in the Temple?)
The Abomination that Causes Desolation in Daniel 9:26-27: In the Middle of the Seven-Year Long War with Rome, the Roman Army under Titus, the Future Emperor of Rome, besieged Jerusalem, put an end to Sacrifice and Offering by destroying Jerusalem and its Temple, and Set up Idols of Zeus, Caesar and Rome on the Eastern Wing of the Temple.
After the sixty-two ‘sevens,’ the Anointed One will be put to death and will have nothing. The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end will come like a flood: War will continue until the end, and desolations have been decreed. He will confirm a covenant with many for one ‘seven.’ In the middle of the ‘seven’ he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And at the wing of the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him. (Daniel 9:26-27)
Israel revolted against Rome in A.D. 66. Approximately, three and a half years later, the Roman army under the general and future emperor Caesar Titus, besieged Jerusalem. When Titus began his siege of Jerusalem he had just recently acquired the title Caesar and upon his father’s death in A.D. 79 was crowned the next emperor of Rome. Thus Titus, the general of the Roman army at the siege of Jerusalem who later became the next emperor of Rome, is the “ruler who will come” mentioned in Daniel 9:26. Many Bibles like the NASB translate “the ruler who will come” as “the prince who is to come.” This prince is Titus who was quite literally a prince during the siege of Jerusalem since he was the firstborn son of the then reigning emperor, Vespasian.
Under the leadership of Prince Titus, the Roman army destroyed Jerusalem and its Temple in A.D. 70 in explicit fulfillment of Daniel 9:26: “The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary.” After Titus destroyed the temple in Jerusalem, the sanctuary mentioned in v. 26, he also literally fulfilled Daniel 9:27 “In the middle of the ‘seven’ he will put an end to sacrifice and offering.” After Titus destroyed the Temple in A.D. 70 it was never rebuilt and as a result the Jews never again performed the sacrificial offerings to the Lord.
But what about the fact that v. 27 predicts that this was to happen “[i]n the middle of the ‘seven’”? The “seven” of v. 27 is a seven-year period. Most preterists mistakenly assume that the Jewish War ended in A.D. 70. This is historically inaccurate. The first Jewish revolt against Rome officially ended at the fall of Masada. In other words, the Jewish War was approximately seven and a half years long as the Roman assault began in Tishri of A.D. 66 and ended at the fall of Masada in Nisan of A.D 74. Thus there were three and a half years from the arrival of the Roman Army (Tishri of A.D. 66) until the start of Titus’ assault on Jerusalem (Nisan of A.D. 70). Then in fulfillment Revelation 9:10, Jerusalem was besieged for five months at which time vs. 26 and 27 were fulfilled including the setting up of the abomination that causes desolation, the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple, and the permanent cessation of Temple sacrifice. Then after the fall of Jerusalem another three and a half years transpired until the conquest of Masada on Passover of A.D. 74, the official end of the war.12 In other words, the “middle of the ‘seven” in v. 27 appears to have been the five month period of Revelation 9:10 in which the events of v. 27 all took place. Thus the siege of Jerusalem literally divided the Jewish War into two equal three-and-a-half year intervals whose sum, of course, equals seven years. Thus the seven year covenant spoken of in v. 27 appears to be fulfilled in the Jewish War itself.
Amidst the siege of Jerusalem, the Romans carried their ensigns into the Temple and propped them up at the Temple’s eastern gate, “and there did they offer sacrifices to them, and there did they make Titus imperator with the greatest acclamations of joy.”13 As mentioned above, the ensigns were Rome’s military standards. These metal idols and flags depicted Zeus, Rome and Caesar. Among these ensigns was the Imago, a graven image of the Emperor. These ensigns were idols to the Roman legions as is illustrated by the fact that the Roman army worshipped the ensigns in the Temple as expressed by Josephus in the quote above.14 The fact that according to Josephus the ensigns were set up and worshipped on the eastern wing of the Temple explicitly fulfills Daniel 9:27: “And at the wing of the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation.” Recall the Roman army is also believed to have sacrificed a pig to these ensigns in the Temple just as did the Greeks in the previous abomination that causes desolation.
This abominable worship of the ensigns at the eastern gate (abomination that causes desolation) was a blasphemous mocking of the ritual sacrifices of Ezekiel 46:1-12. In Ezekiel 46:1-12, the PRINCE of Judah was to “WORSHIP” (Ez 46:2) together with the people of the land at the THRESHOLD of the EASTERN GATE of the Temple (Ez 46:2-3) and sacrifice 6 lambs, a grain offering, a ram, a bull. Remember, Titus was ALSO a PRINCE in A.D. 70 being the firstborn son of the emperor. And Titus “together with [his] people” ALSO WORSHIPED at the EASTERN GATE (Wars 6.6.1) sacrificing an ox, sheep and a PIG as part of suovetaurilia. This blasphemous mocking of Ezekiel 46:1-12 tells Titus’ enemies that HE is the new prince of Israel as Titus once again brings Israel under Roman rule (while leaving the city DESOLATE).
The Abomination that Causes Desolation in Daniel 11:31: During the Maccabean Wars, the Greek army desecrated the Temple, stopped the regular sacrifice and placed an Idol of Zeus on the Temple Altar.
Forces from him will arise, desecrate the sanctuary fortress, and do away with the regular sacrifice. And they will set up the abomination of desolation. (Daniel 11:31)15
This verse and its fulfillment has already been explained above. As previously stated, during the Maccabean Wars of the second century B.C., the Greeks attacked Jerusalem causing a great slaughter in the city. They then placed an idol of Zeus on the Temple altar. The Greek massacre of the people of Jerusalem and the presence of an idol of their god, Zeus, on the holy altar is the abomination that causes desolation in Daniel 11:31. 1 Maccabees 1:54 calls this idol of Zeus “a desolating sacrilege on the altar.”
The Abomination that Causes Desolation in Daniel 12:11: 1,290 days from the Termination of the regular Sacrifice to Caesar in A.D. 66, the Roman army, the Abomination that Causes Desolation, arrived at Jerusalem in Shabbat of A.D. 70.
From the time that the regular [daily] sacrifice is abolished and the abomination of desolation is set up, there will be 1,290 days. (Daniel 12:11)16
At the end of Tammuz or the beginning of Ab of A.D. 66, Eleazar abolished the “regular or daily sacrifice” to Caesar which Josephus says, “[W]as the true beginning of our war with the Romans.”17 1290 days from this act of rebellion ends on Shabbat of A.D. 70, the month and year in which the Roman army arrived outside of Jerusalem preparing to lay siege to the city. As stated above, the Roman army with its idols of Zeus, Caesar and Rome are the abomination that causes desolation. Therefore it seems possible that there were, in fact, 1290 days from the cessation of the “regular sacrifice” to Caesar to the “setting up” of the abomination that causes desolation, the settling of the abominable Roman armies with their idolatrous ensigns outside of Jerusalem.
Though it is true that the abomination that causes desolation is the Roman army itself, it is likely that the “setting up” of the abomination that causes desolation may also refer to another pig sacrifice on the Temple Mount 1290 days after the cessation of the “regular sacrifice” to Caesar. According to De Agri Cultura (160 B.C.) a pig must be sacrificed when cutting down a copse of trees while making the following prayer: “Whatever god or goddess you are to whom this is sacred, you have the right to the sacrifice of a pig in return for the cutting down of this sacred copse.”18 Perhaps in following this religious mandate, the Roman army sacrificed a pig after cutting down trees around Jerusalem when they set up camp and began construction of siege engines upon first arriving at Jerusalem to prepare for the siege in A.D. 70? Could this pig sacrifice which closely resembles the pig sacrifice made by the Greeks under Antiochus Epiphanies be part of what is referred to as the “setting up” of the abomination that causes desolation in Daniel 12:11?
The Abomination that Causes Desolation in Daniel 12:12: Prophecies in the Bible Often Have Dual Fulfillment. The 1,335 Days Prophecy may be an Example of One of These Prophecies.
Biblical predictions frequently have dual fulfillments, an immediate typological fulfillment and a subsequent antitypical fulfillment. One well-known example of this dual fulfillment is the child who was born of a virgin mentioned in Isaiah 7:14. This prediction was initially fulfilled in Isaiah 8:3 when the prophetess gave birth to a boy. This prophecy then appears to have been later fulfilled in the birth of Christ. I believe Daniel 12:12 may be another prophecy that was fulfilled more than once.
The Abomination that Causes Desolation in Daniel 12:12: There were EXACTLY 1,335 Days from the Abolition of the Daily Sacrifice to Caesar in Av of A.D. 66 until the beginning of the Siege of Jerusalem on Passover of A.D. 70.
On the 6th day of Av of A.D. 66 as an act of open revolt against Rome, Eleazar stopped the daily sacrifice to Caesar.19 Counting 1335 days from this act of treason lands on Passover of A.D. 70, when the Roman army began their siege of Jerusalem.20 In Revelation 6:9-11, the martyred saints asked God when He would avenge their unjust deaths. The siege of Jerusalem is God’s answer to these prayers. See Revelation 6: A Preterist Commentary. There were 1,335 days “[f]rom the time that the daily sacrifice [to Caesar was] abolished” until the martyred saints’ prayers for vengeance in Revelation 6:9-11 were answered. Therefore, this 1335 day timeframe fulfills Daniel 12:12: “How blessed is he who keeps waiting and attains to the 1,335 days!”
The Abomination that Causes Desolation in Daniel 12:12: There were also EXACTLY 1,335 Days from the 9th of Av of A.D. 70 when the Roman Army worshiped Idols of Zeus, Rome and Caesar on the Eastern Gate of the Temple until the First Day of Peace at the End of the Jewish War on the 16th of Nisan in A.D. 74.
The Romans set up the ensigns in the Temple and sacrificed a pig to them on the 9th of Av of A.D. 70. Soon after Jerusalem fell. After this climatic event the war was won and the Romans proceeded to mop-up the remaining resistance, the last pocket of which held out at the mountain fortress of Masada. On the 15th of Nisan of A.D. 74 Masada fell. As the Romans were about to break through the fortress walls on the 15th of Nisan, the 960 Jewish rebels at Masada all committed suicide.21 And on that day the war officially ended. The 16th of Nisan, the following day, was the first official day of peace. The 16th of Nisan of A.D. 74 is exactly 1335 days after the ninth day of Av in A.D. 70 when the Romans set fire to the Temple and worshiped the ensigns on its eastern gate.22 “How blessed is he who keeps waiting and attains to the 1,335 days (Daniel 12:12)!”23
Preterism, the Abomination that Causes Desolation and the Beliefs of the Early Church: This Idea that the Abomination that Causes Desolation is the Roman Army and Their Idols of Zeus, Caesar and Rome was Not Uncommon in Early Church Writings.
Modern Christians might initially think that the identity of the abomination that causes desolation proposed above is a new idea. However, this belief appears to have been surprisingly common in early Christian literature. The following is an excerpt from The Early Church and the End of the World by Gary DeMar and Francis X. Gumerlock:
In the eighth century, a Spanish writer named Beatus of Leibana (d. 800) believed in a futurist interpretation of the abomination of desolation, but was aware that “some want it to be understood as the battle of Titus and Vespasian against the Jews and especially the siege of Jerusalem.”24
A ninth or tenth century anonymous Scholia on Matthew also interpreted the abomination of desolation in relation to the A.D. 70 destruction of Jerusalem, saying, “What is the abomination of desolation? It speaks of the image of Titus who captured the city, and after the destruction of Jerusalem erected his own statue.”25
Theophylact of Ochrida (d. 1108) explained the abomination of desolation in this manner: “The abomination of desolation is the statue of the captor of the city. For every idol is called an abomination. And it is one of desolation because after the Romans had captured Jerusalem, they laid waste to it, leaving it desolate, and set up this statue within the sanctuary of the temple.”26
Arnold of Villanova (d. 1311) held a futurist interpretation of the abomination of desolation, but mentioned that a preterist interpretation of it was current in his day among the teachers in Paris, who believed that “the time in which the abomination of desolation was set up, was the time in which Titus and Vespasian placed an image of Caesar in Jerusalem.”27
The early church historian Eusebius (d. 339/340) also appears to have shared a similar view of the abomination that causes desolation:
And from that time a succession of all kinds of troubles afflicted the whole nation and their city until the last war against them, and the final siege, in which destruction rushed on them like a flood [Dan. 9:26] with all kinds of misery of famine [Matt. 24:7], plague [Luke 21:21] and sword [Luke 21:24], and all who had conspired against the Saviour in their youth were cut off; then, too, the abomination of desolation stood in the Temple [Matt. 24:15], and it has remained there even till to-day, while they [i.e., the Jews] have daily reached deeper depths of desolation.28
The fact that Eusebius says that the abomination of desolation remained in Jerusalem to his day appears to refer to the fact that the idol of Zeus, Caesar and Rome erected in the Temple by the Romans in A.D. 70 in a manner was set up in a more permanent way on the site of the old temple not long after its destruction by the Romans when a Temple to Zeus was built over the site of the former Temple.
**NOTE** This is a NEW website. If you liked this article share it, like us on Facebook and follow on Twitter. Thank You!
Interested in THE PRETERIST VIEW OF ESCHATOLOGY, or are you a PRETERIST struggling with a prophecy or verse? It DID happen just like the Bible says! If you liked this essay, see PRETERIST BIBLE COMMENTARY for a detailed explanation of the FULFILLMENT OF ALL MAJOR END TIME PROPHECIES IN THE BIBLE. The more unbelievable the prophecy, the more amazing and miraculous the fulfillment!
Also see Historical Evidence that Jesus was LITERALLY SEEN in the Clouds in the First Century. For an explanation of how the end of the age and its fulfillment during the Jewish War mirror Genesis 1-3; how the Bible teaches that the resurrection of the dead is a resurrection of heavenly bodies to heaven, not a resurrection of perfected earthly bodies; and how the resurrection is a mirror opposite of the fall see How the Jewish War and Resurrection to Heaven Mirror Genesis and the Fall; and How Preterism fixes the Age of the Earth Problem and unravels the Mysteries in Genesis.
- Lynn Louise Schuldt, Prophecy Paradox: The Care for a First Century End Time, 2nd ed., revised (Concord, CA: Son Mountain Press, 2002), 73.
- Josephus says the Roman army worshipped the ensigns on the eastern gate of the Temple. Was this blasphemous worship done at the gate facing inside the Temple or outside? Josephus does not say. It seems probable that this sacrifice was done on the inside of the Temple as the Roman army consisted of a large contingent of up to 20,000 local Jewish troops. These Jewish troops could not be relied upon and so they would have been assigned to various mundane tasks at and around the Roman camp to free-up the better trained, more reliable Roman troops who would have been the ones to enter the city especially the Temple and do the dirty work. It is likely this abominable worship was done on the inside of the Temple out of view of the Jewish local troops. If this sacrifice was done on the outside of the Temple in view of the Jewish soldiers it might have caused a riot. After all a big part of what caused the Jews to revolt against Rome was the fact that a provocateur sacrificed birds outside of a synagogue in Caesarea. Josephus says, “This thing provoked the Jews to an incurable degree, because their laws were affronted, and the place was polluted.” (Wars 2.14.5.) The fact that the synagogue was polluted even though this blasphemy occurred outside the door of the synagogue implies the same concerning the blasphemous sacrifices at the Temple’s eastern gate: Whether or not this blasphemous worship and pig sacrifice occurred inside or just outside the Temple is irrelevant as the Temple would be seen to have been defiled either way. Thus it is likely that this blasphemy occurred inside the Temple out of view of the Jewish local troops.
- http://accchp.allencc.net/cgi-bin/csv/csv.pl?search=aql (2/28/14).
- Josephus The Wars of the Jews 6.6.1.
- Josephus The Antiquities of the Jews 18.5.3.
- Ibid., 18.3.1.
- Josephus The Wars of the Jews 2.14.9.
- Ibid., 2.19.
- Every time “holy place” occurs in the New Testament, it always refers to the Temple, not the city of Jerusalem. In his book Matthew 24 Fulfilled, John Bray says that in 2 Maccabees 2:18 Israel, the holy land, is called the holy place: “As he promised in the law, will shortly have mercy upon us, and gather us together out of every land under heaven into the holy place: for he hath delivered us out of great troubles, and hath purified the place.” (John L. Bray, Matthew 24 Fulfilled, (Powder Springs, GA: American Vision Press, 2008), 58.) However, even in this v. “holy place” just refers to the Temple as it was the Temple, not Israel as a whole, that was purified by the Maccabees during their war with the Greeks as is alluded to in 2 Maccabees 2:18. The gathering of all the Jews “out of every land under heaven” mentioned in this v. refers to the coming together of the Jews to the Temple to celebrate Israel’s holy feasts. Though “holy place” is always used Biblically in reference to the Temple, I do not believe that it is wrong to call Israel or Jerusalem, the holy land and the holy city, the holy place.
- Josephus The Wars of the Jews 6.6.1.
- Ibid., 5.12.
- Jerusalem was conquered on the eighth day of Elul in A.D. 70. The rebels at Masada committed mass suicide on the 15th of Nisan in A.D. 74 approximately three and one-half years later assuming a 360 day Jewish solar year. See Josephus The Wars of the Jews 6.10.1, 7.9.1.
- Josephus The Wars of the Jews 2.17.2.
- Cato on Agriculture 138-41, cited in Brian J. Incigneri, The Gospel to the Romans: The Setting and Rhetoric of Mark’s Gospel, (Boston: 2003), 192.
- Josephus The Wars of the Jews 2.17.2-7. In The Wars of the Jews 2.17.7, Josephus says the assault on Antonia began on the 15th of Av. The day before was the 14th of Av, the festival of Xylophory, mentioned in The Wars of the Jews 2.17.6. In The Wars of the Jews 2.17.5-6, Josephus says there were seven days of fighting until the 13th of Av. Counting back seven days from the 13th of Av places the cessation of the sacrifice to Caesar mentioned in The Wars of the Jews 2.17.2 seemingly on the 6th of Av.
- There were 354 days per year in the Hebrew lunar calendar. The time between the old and new moon is roughly 29.5 days and because there were 12 months in a lunar year, each year was expected to be 354 days long with each month alternating between 29 and 30 days. However, another month was added to the calendar approximately every three years in order to prevent seasonal overlap. Assuming a standard 354 day lunar year with a 29 day leap month sometime within these three and one half years, there is exactly 1335 days from the 6th day of Av in A.D. 66 until the first day of Passover, the 14th of Nisan of A.D. 70. (Leviticus 23:5) According to Josephus, the Romans began their siege of Jerusalem on Passover. (Josephus The Wars of the Jews 5.3.1-5) A couple things must be clarified in this calculation. First, this calculation assumes that the daily sacrifice to Caesar ceased on the 6th of Av of A.D. 66. The logic behind this date is explained in the footnote above. Second, this calculation assumes that the Romans began their siege on the 14th of Nisan as seems to be implied in The Wars of the Jews 5.3.1-5. Second, this calculation assumes a 29 day leap month which is a possibility because the Hebrew lunar calendar was not fixed until the 4th century A.D. Before this time, the length of each month was set by the Sanhedrin and would alternate between 29 and 30 days because the time between the old and new moon approximates 29.5 days. The length of each month was determined when the new moon of the next month was first seen. Thus there was some flexibility in the calendar in which one might expect the leap month to vary between 29 and 30 days depending on when the new moon was first seen to mark the following month. See http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/526874/jewish/The-Jewish-Month.htm (2/2/14).
- Josephus The Wars of the Jews 7.9.1.
- There were 354 days per year in the Hebrew lunar calendar. However, another month was added to the calendar approximately every three years in order to prevent seasonal overlap. Assuming a standard 354 day lunar year with a 30 day leap month sometime within these three and one half years, there is exactly 1335 days from the 9th day of Av in A.D. 70 until the 16th of Nisan, in A.D. 74, the first official day of peace after the war. Josephus says that the 960 Jewish rebels at Masada committed suicide on the “fifteenth day of the month of Xanthicus [Nisan].” (Josephus The Wars of the Jews 7.9.1) Therefore, the first day of peace was the 16th of Nisan of A.D. 74. It is important to note that the Hebrew lunar calendar was not fixed until Hillel, 4th century A.D. Before Hillel, there was no fixed calendar. In other words, it was impossible to determine with certainty when the next month would start. Each month, the Sanhedrin would dictate whether a month would be 29 or 30 days in length. The length of each month was determined when the following month’s new moon was first seen. Thus there was some flexibility in the calendar in which one might expect the leap month to vary between 29 and 30 days depending on when the new moon was first seen to mark the following month because the time between the old and new moon is roughly 29.5 days. Since there were 12 months in a lunar year, each year was expected to be 354 days long with each month alternating between 29 and 30 days. See http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/526874/jewish/The-Jewish-Month.htm (2/2/14).
- Beatus of Leibana and Heterius, Epistle to Elipandus, Book 2, 101. PL 96:1028, cited in Gary DeMar and Francis X. Gumerlock, The Early Church and the End of the World, (Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, Inc., 2006), 87.
- Scholia on Matthew. On Matthew 24:15. PG 106:1151, cited in Gary DeMar and Francis X. Gumerlock, The Early Church and the End of the World, (Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, Inc., 2006), 87.
- Theophylact, Commentary on Mark. On Mark 13:14-17. The Explanation by Blessed Theophylact of the Holy Gospel According to St. Mark (House Springs, MO: Chrysostom Press, 1993), 112, cited in Gary DeMar and Francis X. Gumerlock, The Early Church and the End of the World, (Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, Inc., 2006), 87.
- Arnold of Villanova, On the Time of the Advent of Antichrist. In Heinrich Finke, ed., Aus den Tagen Bonfaz VIII. Funde und Forschungen (Munster: Aschendorff, 1902), CXXXIX, cited in Gary DeMar and Francis X. Gumerlock, The Early Church and the End of the World, (Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, Inc., 2006), 87-88.
- Eusebius Proof of the Gospel 2.138, cited in Gary DeMar and Francis X. Gumerlock, The Early Church and the End of the World, (Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, Inc., 2006), 20.